Over the past 10 years, thousands of U.S. taxpayers with a wide variety of circumstances have been forced to pay extraordinarily high penalties for failure to disclose foreign bank accounts. For years, tax experts said that the penalties imposed by the IRS for non-willful failure to file an FBAR is an issue ripe for a challenge. The first such challenge came in April of 2015 from our firm.
Treading new ground in tax and administrative law
Our case involved a taxpayer who did not report an overseas account for a number of years, then began to remedy his error by (1) hiring a tax lawyer, (2) participating in the 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Initiative which included amending tax returns to report his overseas income and filing late FBARs. As part of the OVDI, the IRS assessed a miscellaneous penalty of $100,218. Based on our extensive experience with the Offshore Initiative, we advised our client regarding withdrawal from the program; which he then chooses to do. The IRS then assessed our client $40,000 ($10,000 per year) in FBAR penalties. However, our client was never given any explanation as to why the penalty was assessed or how the penalties were calculated.
We proceeded with administrative attempts to contest the penalties and to ascertain at a minimum an explanation as to why the penalties were assessed. Eventually our client's administratively remedies were exhausted without a satisfactory explanation as to the penalties being imposed by the Internal Revenue Service. The Internal Revenue Service then threatened to collect the Title 31 civil penalties by offsetting his social security benefits.
We believed that the government's conduct violated the US Constitution: the Fifth Amendment's right to Substantive and Procedural Due Process, the Eight Amendment prohibition against excessive fines, and the Delegation Clause. We further believed that our client was entitled to judicial review of the IRS action under the Administrative Procedures Act.
The Constitutional Arguments
The court held that our client receiving notice and opportunity to contest the penalties was sufficient to provide Due Process. As to the Eighth Amendment Excessive Fines argument the court held that since the fine involved here was only 10% of our client’s account balance it was therefore not “grossly disproportionate to the gravity of the taxpayer’s offense," however, it further held that such a fine on a smaller balance may well be! This is a significant development on behalf of taxpayers facing these types of fines and opens the door a little wider for taxpayers to assert an excessive fine violation in these types of matters.
The APA Arguments
Our arguments that the IRS failed to meet the requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), however, received significant attention by the court. Firstly, it held that as an agency subject to APA requirements, the IRS’ actions are subject to judicial review to determine whether they were “arbitrary or capricious, constituted an abuse of discretion, or were otherwise not made in accordance with law” under 5 U.S. Code § 70. The court also stated that the IRS appeals letter did not satisfy the requirement to inform the taxpayer of its reasons for imposing the maximum penalty. Although the FBAR Summary Memorandum was more detailed in its analysis (this evidence was only discovered by Court Ordered discovery), the court held that it also did not qualify since (1) it was not sent to our client and (2) it still failed to adequately explain the reason for the penalties imposed.
The IRS was ordered to supplement its records with information explaining its decision to impose the maximum penalty. The court threatened that if it failed to do so, it would rule that the IRS had imposed penalties that were “arbitrary and capricious” in violation of the APA.
What everyone learned from this case
The result of this case was clarification of the IRS’ responsibility to comply with APA requirements, and it has received significant attention for that reason. Our case has also created a significant change in the way the IRS determines, calculates, and assesses FBAR penalties. U.S. taxpayers now know that:
- The IRS is subject to APA requirements
- The APA applies to FBAR penalties imposed by the IRS
- Taxpayers are entitled to timely notice of the IRS’ reasons for FBAR penalty assessments
- The penalty amount must be reasonable and proportionate
- Penalties must be reasonably justified to the taxpayer before they can be enforced
Because of firm’s efforts, the IRS was forced to change the Internal Revenue Manual and issue new guidance on FBAR penalties, significantly changing the way the IRS looks at foreign bank account cases and the imposition of penalties. See SBSE-4-0515-0025 and applies to all open cases where the FBAR is considered.
Quality, aggressive penalty litigation
The tax attorneys at Moskowitz, LLP are ready and prepared to continue to make new ground in contesting unjust FBAR and other tax penalties. We stand ready to litigate the imposition of unfair FBAR penalty case. Stay tuned.